Comparing Ritchie vs. Drinking Post automatic horse waterers: costs, installation, winter performance, and which system fits different properties and routines.

We recently got a call from a customer — let’s call her Linda — who was trying to set up water for two horses at her son’s old farmhouse. Her son was about to be deployed, she had three young grandkids to help with, and as she put it, “I’m retired — I do not want to haul water all winter.”
Linda had heard about us from neighbors and came with a great question: “Do you recommend a Ritchie automatic waterer or that pole thing — the Drinking Post?” We install a lot of both, and we even use a Drinking Post at our own place, so her question turned into a really helpful on-site conversation.
In this post, I’ll walk you through the same comparison we gave Linda: how each system works, installation needs, costs, winter performance, and which one tends to fit different types of properties and owners.
Ritchie automatic waterers are insulated water bowls mounted on a concrete pad. They use a low-watt heater and good insulation to keep a small amount of water open all winter. Horses drink from a standing reservoir that refills automatically as they drink.
Drinking Post waterers are vertical frost-free posts. There’s no standing bowl of water. When the horse presses the paddle, the valve opens, fresh water flows up, and when the paddle is released the remaining water drains back below the frost line.
So the basic trade-off is:
When Linda called, she wasn’t even sure where the closest well or hydrant was on that old farmhouse property. That’s actually common with older places. Here’s what we typically look at.
This makes a Ritchie install a little more involved up front, but it’s a very solid, long-term setup — especially if we’re already trenching and you plan to keep horses there for years.
Because there’s no pad or power run, a Drinking Post is usually cheaper and quicker to put in. That’s why I told Linda they’re generally less expensive on the installation side.
Both options have two cost buckets: what you pay to get it in the ground, and what you deal with over the next 10–20 years.
For folks like Linda, who may have family or farm sitters doing chores, that visible bowl is a big plus. It’s easy for anyone to confirm, “Yup, there’s water.”
At our own place, we like the Drinking Post, but we’re also here every day and comfortable tinkering with it if needed. That’s an important difference.
Winter is where the choice really matters. Linda’s main concern was not hand-hauling buckets when it’s below zero.
That’s why, on the phone with Linda, I said: if you’re gone a lot in winter and someone else is doing chores, I’d lean toward a Ritchie. It’s simply more forgiving when the weather gets ugly.
Your setup matters as much as the brand. When we come out for an estimate, here are the questions we walk through.
In Linda’s case, all the horses shared one area, and they weren’t aggressive over water. A single Ritchie unit would easily serve her two (soon three) horses.
With Linda, the deciding factors were clear: winter reliability, grandkids and caregivers doing chores, and her son leaving on deployment. We recommended a Ritchie, sized for a single shared paddock, tied into the nearest water source with a proper pad and power.
If you’re weighing Ritchie vs. Drinking Post for your own horses, we’re happy to walk your property, find your best water source, and talk through your routine — who’s doing chores, how often you travel, and how your paddocks are laid out. From there, we can give you a straightforward quote and a recommendation that fits both your budget and your peace of mind in January.